SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brandon Vincent <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brandon Vincent <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:57:07 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:51 AM, David Sommerseth
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 04/08/14 00:07, Brandon Vincent wrote:
> I'd say the issue is more 4k stacks than 32-bit.  But I might be wrong.
>  I also thought that support for 4k stacks had been removed [1].  That
> article also mentions that even the default 8K stack size can sometimes
> be too small for XFS.

You are correct. If I recall correctly, Red Hat historically has used
4k stacks on 32-bit kernels because of the benefits it provides (or so
upstream says) for systems running large numbers of threads. The x64
kernel source never had the CONFIG_4KSTACKS configuration item.

Brandon Vincent

ATOM RSS1 RSS2