SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:51:32 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On 04/08/14 00:07, Brandon Vincent wrote:
> Running a 4k stack size on a 32-bit kernel and XFS is mostly reliable,
> but is notorious for causing stack overflows (typically with high load
> and other heavy system utilization). It is for that reason that
> upstream has always maintained the position of "Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux does not support XFS on 32-bit machines".

I'd say the issue is more 4k stacks than 32-bit.  But I might be wrong.
 I also thought that support for 4k stacks had been removed [1].  That
article also mentions that even the default 8K stack size can sometimes
be too small for XFS.

[1] <https://lwn.net/Articles/600644/>


--
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

ATOM RSS1 RSS2