SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 1 Jul 2014 05:05:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Unless the SRPMs distributed by Red Hat are a misrepresentation, a build
> from these SRPMs should yield RPMs that are identical (bit for bit, e.g.,
> under a real binary compare) to the installable RPMs provided by Red Hat.

The bit for bit comparison can be different because, as was explained
by one of the CentOS developers during the CentOS 6 rebuild, if foo
has a build dependency on bar, RH sometimes uses an unreleased version
of bar in order to build foo. Rebuilders like CentOS and SL have to
make do with the released version of the bar srpm in order to build
foo.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2