Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:45:03 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 07/28/2014 06:37 AM, Brent L. Bates wrote:
> At my previous job, I used the XFS file system almost
> exclusively. I only used ext[2-3], if I had no other choice and I
> usually worked to get them changed to XFS, if at all possible. I
> started using XFS when it first came out for SGI's, probably 20 years
> ago.. I also used xfsdump/xfsrestore to tape. When we switched to
> LINUX, I also used XFS there as well. XFS and it's utilities are
> VASTLY superior to ext[2-4] and dump/restore. XFS is better, faster,
> HUGELY more reliable, and far more robust tha ext[2-4]. I've seen XFS
> survive repeated system crashes and hardware failures and still be
> able to get my data off of it.
>
> restore doesn't care what file system you restore to. All it
> cares about is the source. You should be able to take your old dumps
> and restore them to XFS file systems. Once on your new XFS file
> systems, use xfsdump/xfsrestore to create new backups.
>
Hi Brent,
Awesome! Thank you!
So if I was happy with ext4, I should be delirious
with XFS.
-T
|
|
|