Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:59:29 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The maven and tomcat and ruby193 packages look nice. Organized access to those could save me a lot if local setup work.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
Email: [log in to unmask]
Sent from iPhone
> On Jul 11, 2014, at 8:24, Jonathan Perkin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> * On 2014-07-11 at 12:58 BST, James M. Pulver wrote:
>
>> The question I'm asking is... "Why?" ... What does this get me that
>> EPEL etc don't? Are these especially obscure packages? I mean, "zip"
>> is in SL repo. "xpdf" is in EPEL... Wordnet is in SL repo etc. ..
>
> Hi James,
>
> For me it was easy enough to provide these packages, as we already do
> bulk builds for a number of other operating systems. We provide
> CentOS 6.5 in our cloud, so it was very little effort to set up.
>
> They aren't meant to replace existing repositories, nor meant to be
> used instead of continuing to develop EPEL etc. I'm just offering
> them in case they provide packages people need which aren't currently
> available in the native repositories.
>
> Whilst there are a lot of obscure packages included, it is also the
> primary package manager for a number of operating systems, and so
> there is by necessity a lot of up-to-date software provided too.
>
> If it turns out that there is too much overlap and there isn't any
> benefit, that's fine. I just thought I'd offer them up and see what
> interest there is, and can then decide if it's worth continuing.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jonathan Perkin - Joyent, Inc. - www.joyent.com
|
|
|