Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:58:35 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
For SL7 we would like to switch to the upstream provided 'yum-cron'
instead of our 'yum-autoupdate' package. The recent releases seem to be
feature compatible with yum-autoupdate from SL6, but have the advantage
of upstream development.
Are there any objections?
What if any packages should be excluded from the default automatic
update? If you've a list of suggestions, should it be set out of the
box or via a 'tweak rpm'?
A brief bit on why I (Pat Riehecky, not speaking for SL here) like
having updates on by default. If you know what you are doing, you can
disable this and schedule updates with your downtime windows. The SL
audience ranges from professional systems admins to graduate students
with little training in systems administration. This leaves the systems
in a 'default less hackable' state, and, to my mind, helps protect less
experienced users as well as the wider internet from the possible side
effects of unpatched systems. There are still systems out there
vulnerable to Heartbleed. But none of those are SL boxes left in their
default state.
Pat
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/
|
|
|