Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:53:41 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Pat,
The sl-testing package looks good to me. Thanks for the quick response!
-Mike
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:25:55PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 03/12/2014 12:24 PM, Michael Morgan wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> > The luci package distributed with at least SL6.5 is missing some
> > necessary
> >options in
> >/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/luci/lib/ricci_communicator.py.
> >Specifically around:
> >
> >def resolve_cluster_version(uname_str):
> > if 'Santiago' in uname_str:
> > return (3, 'RHEL', uname_str[uname_str.find('6.'):].split(' ')[0])
> > elif 'Tikanga' in uname_str:
> > return (2, 'RHEL', uname_str[uname_str.find('5.'):].split(' ')[0])
> > elif 'Nahant' in uname_str:
> > return (1, 'RHEL', uname_str[uname_str.find('4.'):].split(' ')[0])
> >
> > It can't currently determine SL's cluster version from
> > /etc/redhat-release.
> >This causes problems with the web interface since certain options require
> >the
> >cluster version to be set properly (ie. available fencing device types).
> >
> > Let me know if any other info is needed. Thanks.
> >
> >-Mike
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I've placed an altered package in the sl-testing repo.
>
> Can I have you examine it and see if it corrects your issues?
>
> Pat
>
> --
> Pat Riehecky
>
> Scientific Linux developer
> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
|
|
|