Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:24:37 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 02/10/2014 03:16 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:58 PM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 02/09/2014 11:45 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My toolchain for building a complete Samba 4.1.4 on Scientific Linux 6
>>>> is available at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo. It's set up to
>>>> set up a local yum repository for the necessary dependencies, and uses
>>>> the EPEL published tool "mock" to build the toolchain in a clean local
>>>> environment without accidental and incompatible system integrations.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Nico,
>>
>> What was your reason for doing it yourself, versus SerNet:
>> http://www.enterprisesamba.com/samba/
>
> In my opinion, my spec files are cleaner, more explicit about
> dependencies and options, and more compatible with the curren
> tupstream RHEL, Sckentific Linux, and Fedora environments. I also
> publish the necessary components to build up the "mock" toolchain to
> build the dependencies. And I'm the author of the first published
> ports of Samba to SunOS 4.1.x, so I've been at it a while as a useful
> hobby. I also find it irritating as futz to have to register to
> download the SerfNet packages.
>
> I've submitted some patches to SerfNet in the past: they don't
> necessarily agree with my tweaks or RHEL's tweaks, and I've never
> heard back from them.
>
Hi Nico,
Just out of curiosity, does "samba-tool" show up in
your spin?
-T
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|