SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:10:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Sunday 09 February 2014 8:07 am, you wrote:
> On 09/02/14 13:44, Henrique C. S. Junior wrote:
> > I'd like to know what people think about (possible) future scenarios for
> > Scientific Linux. Let's say:
> >  - If SL becomes a CentOS SIG (builded using the CentOS Core) does it
> > still worth the time or will you change to CentOS?
> >  - If nothing changes and SL continue to be build from SRPMs (with a
> > huge delay compared to CentOS)
> >  - If SL dies to be replaced by CentOS at CERN and Fermi Lab
> >
> > Feel free to add new scenarios.
>
> I will suggest this in stead:  Have patience!
>
> The SL team is figuring out what's they will do, and I guess they're in
> contact with CentOS about this too.  Let's avoid speculating, it's way
> too early for that.
>
>
> --
> kind regards,
>
> David Sommerseth

Anyone specialize in reading "tea leaves"  
enough said.  Speculation and social stuff do not belong here.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2