SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:07:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
On 09/02/14 13:44, Henrique C. S. Junior wrote:
> I'd like to know what people think about (possible) future scenarios for
> Scientific Linux. Let's say:
>  - If SL becomes a CentOS SIG (builded using the CentOS Core) does it
> still worth the time or will you change to CentOS?
>  - If nothing changes and SL continue to be build from SRPMs (with a
> huge delay compared to CentOS)
>  - If SL dies to be replaced by CentOS at CERN and Fermi Lab
> 
> Feel free to add new scenarios.

I will suggest this in stead:  Have patience!

The SL team is figuring out what's they will do, and I guess they're in
contact with CentOS about this too.  Let's avoid speculating, it's way
too early for that.


--
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

ATOM RSS1 RSS2