SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Robert Marino <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paul Robert Marino <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:26:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Nico
I tend to agree with you there are so many inexpensive mail services
out there now I haven't tried to do this kind of thing in many years.
But its not an option for every one especially it you work for a large
company then it can still be cheaper to do it in house or depending on
the industry your company is involved in there may be regulatory
reasons why SAAS is not an option for any thing considered a document
of record like email.


On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I've not tried that particular tool. I can only say "good luck, we've
> seen that tried many times now". We don't need yet *another* attempt
> at a drop-in replacement.
>
> Break the cycle, and save some money and improve workflow at the same
> time. Email and messaging are now available as very effective SAAS
> products, and you don't need to manage your own SL based systems to
> provide excellent quality services. Save the infrastructure
> requirements for service that *do* need in-house support. Developer
> workstations, Beowulf clusters, proprietary data backups, web services
> for your own applications.
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Paul Robert Marino <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> have you looked at openchange http://www.openchange.org/index.html
>> It's been a few years since I looked at it but the goal is to create a
>> exchange server replacement.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2