SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:09:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (186 lines)
One *could* simply do "yum remove nautilus". There are dependencies,
but I've found the package to be quite destabilizing over the years..

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 02:45 AM, Jon Clark wrote:
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yasha
>> Karant
>> Sent: 05 February 2014 07:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Cc: Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide
>> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Nautilus respawning to infinity
>>
>> On 02/04/2014 01:06 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Elias Persson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2014-02-04 10:40, Matthieu Guionnet wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 04/02/2014 04:52, John H. Outlan a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Several of us over at the forum are having a nautilus problem.
>>>>>>> Nautilus is respawning non stop and filling the window list on
>>>>>>> bottom panel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some with update, some with clean 6.5 x64 install.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's the forum link:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://scientificlinuxforum.org/index.php?act=ST&f=5&t=2634&st=0#e
>>>>>>> ntry17238
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I confirm the reason and the (temporary)  solution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's due to the last librsvg2 update After a yum downgrade
>>>>>> librsvg2, Nautilus closes all the listed windows on bottom panel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthieu.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seemingly caused by:
>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414
>>>>> This issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone for the detailed information and the bug link!
>>>>
>>>> Pat
>>>
>>> Fix coming: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414#c25
>>>
>>> Akemi
>>
>> One small note.  I can confirm the defect -- I had just upgraded a
>> colleague's IA-32 laptop workstation, and the entire desktop lost all icons
>> (the user lives by icons and cannot effectively use a scrolling terminal
>> without written key stroke instructions for each command, including
>> return/enter keystrokes).  However, I had installed both
>> librsvg2 and the -devel version, both of which automatically upgraded to
>> the defective release.  I had to manually rpm -e of the -devel version
>> before yum would allow the downgrade. After the downgrade, the window
>> manager interface seems to be working.  I did attempt to use KDE instead of
>> gnome (this being a login choice from a button on the login GUI screen), and
>> KDE seemed to work for non-gnome applications, but I did
>> not extensively test the proper functioning of KDE.   As this "upgrade"
>> automatically was installed on many of our machines, we shall need to
>> manually downgrade a number of machines.  Any ETA on the fixed version that
>> should auto-update?
>>
>> A separate question.  Unlike Microsoft, TUV EL is supposed to be a
>> production enterprise system.  As this is a major failure of what amounts to
>> a default GUI of EL, does anyone have an idea as to how this defect passed
>> qualification testing prior to production release?  I am not expecting SL to
>> test the functionality of TUV production release updates, but rather the
>> correctness of the port from TUV to SL -- this defect clearly is a TUV
>> issue.
>>
>> Yasha Karant
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just upgraded the librsvg2 package to the latest available version.
>> This immediately solved the problem without the need for a manual rpm -e of
>> the -devel version.  Details below.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> $ sudo yum update librsvg2
>> Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Update
>> Process Resolving Dependencies
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package librsvg2.x86_64 0:2.26.0-6.el6_5.2 will be updated
>> --> Processing Dependency: librsvg2 = 2.26.0-6.el6_5.2 for package:
>> --> librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
>> ---> Package librsvg2.x86_64 0:2.26.0-6.el6_5.3 will be an update
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package librsvg2-devel.x86_64 0:2.26.0-6.el6_5.2 will be updated
>> ---> Package librsvg2-devel.x86_64 0:2.26.0-6.el6_5.3 will be an update
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>
>> Dependencies Resolved
>>
>>
>> =============================================================================================================================================================
>>   Package                                Arch
>> Version                                     Repository
>> Size
>>
>> =============================================================================================================================================================
>> Updating:
>>   librsvg2                               x86_64
>> 2.26.0-6.el6_5.3                            sl-security
>> 139 k
>> Updating for dependencies:
>>   librsvg2-devel                         x86_64
>> 2.26.0-6.el6_5.3                            sl-security
>> 30 k
>>
>> Transaction Summary
>>
>> =============================================================================================================================================================
>> Upgrade       2 Package(s)
>>
>> Total download size: 169 k
>> Is this ok [y/N]: y
>> Downloading Packages:
>> Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata Processing delta metadata
>> Package(s) data still to download: 169 k
>> (1/2): librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
>> | 139 kB     00:01
>> (2/2): librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
>> |  30 kB     00:00
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Total
>> 58 kB/s | 169 kB     00:02
>> Running rpm_check_debug
>> Running Transaction Test
>> Transaction Test Succeeded
>> Running Transaction
>>    Updating   : librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.x86_64
>> 1/4
>>    Updating   : librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.x86_64
>> 2/4
>>    Cleanup    : librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
>> 3/4
>>    Cleanup    : librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
>> 4/4
>>
>> Updated:
>>    librsvg2.x86_64 0:2.26.0-6.el6_5.3
>>
>> Dependency Updated:
>>    librsvg2-devel.x86_64 0:2.26.0-6.el6_5.3
>>
>> Complete!
>
> From:
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/i386/updates/security/
>
> [RPM]   librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
> <http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/i386/updates/security/librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.i686.rpm>
> 04-Feb-2014 15:40       139K
>
>
>
>
>         librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
> <http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/i386/updates/security/librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.i686.rpm>
> 04-Feb-2014 15:40       30K
>
>
> Thus, it appears that as of some time on 4 Feb, the later update was posted.
> Will any further updates using 6x (including "fresh" on-line updates to 6.5)
> now include this (presumably) functioning library?  Is there a specific
> setting somewhere in the update mechanism (other than using the 6x
> repository) that is required to enable the latest (that is, skip 5.2 that
> still is listed and just use 5.3)?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2