SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:26:39 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Going from SL 6.(X) to 6.(X+1), the newer kernels are released as errata
down the chain to previous minor releases.

I've noticed that some specific firmware packages are also sometimes
pushed down the chain (bfa-firmware for example), but many are not.

For example, the 6.5 kernel series contains important updates for QLogic
HBA adapters (we are always interested in the qla2xxx driver here :o).

Along with the newer kernels are important QLogic firmware updates this
time around - the firmware update goes from  5.08.00 to 7.00.01. in
ql2500-firmware.

It seems to me that it would be prudent to always push the current
specific firmware packages as errata when the kernel from a new
minor release first makes it to errata.  What do you think?

cheers, etc.
  denice
-- 
deatrich @ triumf.ca, Science/ATLAS         PH: +1 604-222-7665
<*> This moment's fortune cookie:
Hempstone's Question:
 	If you have to travel on the Titanic, why not go first class?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2