SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Patrick J. LoPresti" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick J. LoPresti
Date:
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:50:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 01/15/2014 11:27 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>
> so, rather than looking at an opinion blog, why dont you go read the
> actual announcement ? see if that mentions this little detail...

Do you mean Red Hat's announcement?

http://www.redhat.com/about/news/press-archive/2014/1/red-hat-and-centos-join-forces

Or maybe Red Hat's FAQ?

http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/

...

Oh, I see. You mean your mailing list message:

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-January/020100.html

Yes, I did miss that. Mea culpa.

My own interest is in Scientific Linux; I never much cared for CentOS.
And I admit to a strong cynicism about what this acquisition will
ultimately mean for SL.

But trolling? Certainly not. I would have been perfectly happy with
far fewer non-researched, ill-thought-out responses. Zero, actually.

 - Pat

ATOM RSS1 RSS2