SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: DNS Servers
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:32:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
AD is fine with a delegated domain. Allow zone transfers so the BIND server can generate reverse DNS with "mkrdns"

Nico Kadel-Garcia
Email: [log in to unmask]
Sent from iPhone

> On Jan 9, 2014, at 21:37, Jeremy Wellner <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> That's a resounding stay the course and I don't mind that one bit.  It's been rock solid and I've been happy with it.
> 
> So as a secondary question, we are planning on adding Active Directory in to our network and I know that it is very particular about it's DNS.  Will AD be happy with being given a delegate domain to have as it's sandbox or does that throw my BIND install out the window?
> 
> Thank you all for the advise!! :)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2