SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"William R. Somsky" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William R. Somsky
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:12:36 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
One thing people should keep in mind while discussing this is the why 
the original Fermilab distro (and Cern distro) which then became 
Scientific Linux was created, and why Fermilab continues to actively 
commit resources to SL. Remember Fermilab (and Cern) are particle 
accelerator facilities with million/billion dollar experiments that 
*must* have long-term guarantees of stable and supported software.

To make Scientific Linux a variant of Centos would be to introduce an 
unknown/uncontrollable element as a controlling factor in the mix.  What 
if Centos pulled an Ubuntu and decided to start introducing 
controversial changes in an attempt to become more "user friendly" or to 
"win the desktop"?

A merging w/ Centos would need to carefully consider such issues.

On 01/08/14 11:53, Connie Sieh wrote:
> We are in the process of researching/evaluating this news and how it 
> impacts Scientific Linux.
>
> -Connie Sieh
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2