SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:48:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
The changes between RC1 and the official release did not result in any 
package rebuilds that I remember.  The changes were primarily multilib 
and installation media based.

I do not believe a re-install is necessary if you utilized RC1. The beta 
is a different story......

Pat

On 01/31/2014 07:47 AM, Carl Friedberg wrote:
> Speaking of i386, I notice that the dates on the images are Dec 17, 2013. (that was RC1?) If there have been no further changes since RC1, do I still have to re-install? I upgraded my 6.4 with the RC1 not realizing it was an RC, and not the gold...
>
> Opiions appreciated. Thanks
>
> Carl Friedberg
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lucian Stroe
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 3:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Scientific Linux 6.5 is officially released for i686/x86_64
>
> Hello all,
>
> in
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/i386/iso/
>
> the boot CD is missing, while in
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/x86_64/iso/
>
> the boot CD is present.
>
> Lucian Stroe.


-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2