SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carl Friedberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carl Friedberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:47:59 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Speaking of i386, I notice that the dates on the images are Dec 17, 2013. (that was RC1?) If there have been no further changes since RC1, do I still have to re-install? I upgraded my 6.4 with the RC1 not realizing it was an RC, and not the gold...

Opiions appreciated. Thanks

Carl Friedberg


-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lucian Stroe
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 3:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Scientific Linux 6.5 is officially released for i686/x86_64

Hello all,

in

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/i386/iso/

the boot CD is missing, while in

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/x86_64/iso/

the boot CD is present.

Lucian Stroe. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2