SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Bishop <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Adam Bishop <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:47:54 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On 29 Jan 2014, at 09:52, John Rowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I've been warned that my SL 5.9 machine is potentially vulnerable to the
> recently announced DOS attack. As far as I can see both my 5.9 and 6x
> machines are running vulnerable versions, am I missing something or are
> we vulnerable?


Have a look at these two pages:
  https://cert.litnet.lt/en/docs/ntp-distributed-reflection-dos-attacks
  https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/s2_Configure_Rate_Limiting_Access_to_an_NTP_service.html

I don't know if the fix has been back ported to EL or not (use the test in the first article to check) - if someone has warned you that you are vulnerable, the best option is to rate limit NTP clients.

Even if the fix has been back ported, rate limiting is still a good thing to do.

Regards,
  
Adam Bishop

 gpg: 0x6609D460

Janet, the UK's research and education network.


Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a 
not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024 
and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238

ATOM RSS1 RSS2