On 01/27/2014 07:50 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> It seems there's a new flavor of libibverbs:
>
> SL/6.5 % find ./ -name libibverbs\*|grep -v 'repoview\|fastbugs'
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>
> 1) Why the i386 updates?
>
> 2) Why both flavors on x86_64? this seems not to make sense, since:
>
> SL/6.5 % rpm -qp --obsoletes ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> libibverbs < 1.1.8
>
> 3) Why no -rocee for i686?
>
> This makes updates fail on x86_64 systems with libibverbs.i686 installed.
>
> Sorry for the late report
> 	Stephan
>

Hi Stephan,

I'm trying to follow SA-2013-1661 and EA-2013-1740, there are a lot of 
packages listed out on those pages.

The i386 packages were removed by accident during the build process and 
restored.  Somehow I missed the security packages during my clean up.  
Fixed.

As for both flavors being in SL 6.5, the two listed updates above were 
published with upstream's release of 6.5, so I'm attempting follow that 
closely.

The missing -rocee i686 packages in x86_64 is more of a puzzle.  My 
archived copy of EA-2013-1740 from 2013-11-21 does not show the i686 
packages in x86_64, but the current publication does.  There was 
probably a documentation error somewhere.  I'll get the fixes staged up.

Thanks for the bug report!

Pat



-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/