SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

December 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:27:32 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On 12/16/2013 02:07 PM, Scott Dowdle wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A friend of mine uses glusterfs and he recently noticed that Red Hat added glusterfs packages to 6.5 via an additional channel entitlement.  As a result, EPEL dropped their glusterfs packages as they have a policy not to conflict with stock packages.
>
> Looks like CentOS didn't notice because there aren't glusterfs packages there.
>
> Does Scientific Linux plan to provide glusterfs packages starting with 6.5?
>
> Thanks,

As part of SL6.5 we provide some glusterfs packages:

glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm

These packages are what upstream provided as part of BA-2013-1641

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2