On 07/24/2013 03:07 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Bonnie King wrote: >> >>> Synopsis: Critical: firefox security update >>> Advisory ID: SLSA-2013:0981-1 >>> Issue Date: 2013-06-25 >> >>> SL5 >>> x86_64 >>> firefox-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm >>> firefox-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm >>> firefox-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm >>> firefox-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm >>> xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm >>> xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm >>> xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm >>> xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm >> >> I can't find the xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9 packages in >> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/ >> (the i386.rpm *is* in >> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/i386/updates/security/ > > No it isn't. I can't tell devel from debuginfo :-( sorry. > > The question should have been; should we remove > http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.5-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm > > ? > > It is in > http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/archives/debuginfo/ > where I would expect to find it. > Thanks for the information! I've moved the debuginfo package out of the way. You were correct, it should not have been in http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/ Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/