Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 May 2013 10:38:50 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 28/05/13 21:36, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 05/28/2013 02:08 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
>> The latest ClamAV that I can find pre-ported fro SL6 x86-64 is
>>
>> http://pkgs.repoforge.org/clamav/clamd-0.97.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64.rpm
>
> EPEL has a slightly newer version of this package:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=413926
I can recommend the EPEL version. I'm using it in several production
environments.
>> Will this RPM "override" dependencies in the "stock" SL distribution?
>> EL (and Linux in general) does not seem to have reliable polymorphism
>> -- the default for these sorts of dependencies generally does not seem
>> to install a different executable/library sub-tree independent of the
>> stock distribution except in so far as the same files (e.g.,
>> libraries) are used.
There should be no issues with running the EPEL version at least. No
dependency issues from what I've seen.
>> However, ClamAV still appears to be pre-production (0.x, not 1.x). Is
>> it stable and useful?
Don't look yourself blind on version numbers - especially on Open Source
project. Having a release being 0.x-something doesn't mean it's not
stable or usable. You need to check what the each project defines as
their stable release.
<http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/>
And FWIW, Zimbra ships with these ClamAV 0.x versions as well as part of
the integrated anti-virus mail checks.
What is even more important with anti-virus, is updated virus databases.
Which gets updates almost every day, and freshclam in ClamAV takes care
of that job.
--
kind regards,
David Sommerseth
|
|
|