SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: IO performance regressions with kernel-2.6.32-358
From:
Bill Maidment <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Maidment <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 May 2013 16:51:52 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines) 
After upgrading to kernel-2.6.32-358.6.2 the swap is still used in preference to RAM during backups.

Regards
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
 
 
-----Original message-----
> From:Orion Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday 26th April 2013 11:03
> To: Bill Maidment <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: Olivier Mauras <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: IO performance regressions with kernel-2.6.32-358
> 
> On 04/25/2013 05:32 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
> > Hi again.
> > Just a quick note to say I've tried upgrading to the latest kernel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 just in case the problem had been "accidentally" fixed.
> > However, swap is still used in preference to RAM during backups.
> > I've changed yum.conf to installonly_limit=5 so I don't lose my working kernel-2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64 on the next two kernel updates.
> > Anyone have any news on bug 949166 yet?
> 
> I'm afraid not.  Thanks for checking the latest kernel.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Orion Poplawski
> Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
> NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane                  [log in to unmask]
> Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2