SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bluejay Adametz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bluejay Adametz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 May 2013 14:10:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> (There is some mumbling about RAID1 being unfriendly to SSD flash media,
> but it seems to work just fine here

I suspect that the electronic nature of the SSDs might make them more
prone to a failure due to usage patterns, as opposed to a mechanical
drive where the failures might be more random. If you mirror a pair of
SSDs, you're applying the same usage to both of them, and they might
be prone to both fail at the same time.

What if you mirrored an SSD with a rotating disk? Yeah, writes would
be at the rotating disk speed, but reads should benefit. And when that
SSD wears out because it hits n writes, you still have the rotating
disk to keep you running. Or is that just a mad idea?

                                                         - Bluejay Adametz

I think part of a best friend's job should be to immediately
clear your computer history if you die. - Truths for Mature Humans

-- 


NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is only for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information, or information otherwise protected from disclosure by law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying, dissemination or distribution of this message or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately by reply email and destroy this message, including all attachments, and any copies thereof. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2