On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:

> Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that?

I forgot to announce it.  Will do so soon.  In class this week.

-Connie Sieh

>
> Graham
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> The Scientific Linux build is available at:
>>
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
>>> I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I
>>> appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a
>>> nightmare to build?
>>>
>>> I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build
>>> available (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I
>>> haven't looked at it.
>>>
>>> Graham
>>>
>>> On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:
>>>> Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
>>>> compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
>>>> beta testers.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
>>>>>> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
>>>>>> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
>>>>> than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
>>>>> promises of course (disclaimer).
>