SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2013 12:07:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
The Scientific Linux build is available at:

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/

Pat

On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
> I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I appreciate the 
> "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a nightmare to build?
>
> I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build available 
> (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I haven't looked at it.
>
> Graham
>
> On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:
>> Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
>> compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
>> beta testers.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>>>
>>>> Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
>>>> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
>>>>
>>>> https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
>>>>
>>>> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
>>>> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
>>>
>>> I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
>>> than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
>>> promises of course (disclaimer).
>>>
>>> -Connie Sieh
>
>


-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2