SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Allan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Graham Allan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2013 12:04:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I appreciate 
the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a nightmare to build?

I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build available 
(http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I haven't looked at it.

Graham

On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:
> Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
> compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
> beta testers.
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>>
>>> Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
>>> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
>>>
>>>     https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
>>>
>>> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
>>> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
>>
>> I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
>> than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
>> promises of course (disclaimer).
>>
>> -Connie Sieh


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Allan - I.T. Manager - [log in to unmask] - (612) 624-5040
School of Physics and Astronomy - University of Minnesota
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2