SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:12:51 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Evidently, from URL:

http://nspluginwrapper.org/why.html

nspluginwrapper is currently the only means to run a plugin in a browser 
of a different architecture. It is most commonly used to run a 32-bit 
plugin built for x86 in a 64-bit browser built for x86-64

End quote

and thus appears to address the issue I have raised in a different 
thread.  I have found:

nspluginwrapper-1.4.4-1.el6_3.x86_64.rpm - A compatibility layer for 
Netscape 4 plugins

Does anyone have experience with this adaptation layer compatibility 
insert?  If so, good, bad, and is it reliable?

Yasha Karant

ATOM RSS1 RSS2