Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:12 +0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Paul Robert Marino <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> As for JFS its been a long time since I tested it but I had the reverse
>> issue.
>> Oh and I know the issue you ran into with xfs its rare but has been known to
>> happen I've hit it once my self on a laptop its a journal problem, and fsck
>> isn't the tool to use.
>> There is a specific xfs repair tool to fix the journal or can rebuild it
>> from the backup inodes
>
> Then are you agreed that it's too likely to occur for high reliability
> filesystems, and only more suitable for high flowthrough data whose
> provenance is not so critical?
>
Certainly not!
Here at JINR we have more than 50 servers with about 2PB
used space serviced by XFS. All data are critical for
LHC experiments. Quite a few servers run for about a 5 years
till now. Just a few files were lost due to damn 3-ware
destroyed own DCB.
The latest incident with xfs+nfs is not the xfs problem too.
--
Best regards,
Valery Mitsyn
|
|
|