SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:19:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On 03/14/2013 04:56 PM, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The recent update to Open AFS (kmod-openafs-1.6.2-4.SL64.el6.noarch.rpm) has dependencies on two kmod packages, which ultimately creates a dependency on two kernels.  I'm just curious whether this was intentional or inadvertent.  If intentional, why two kernels?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
The package depends on the '6.4' kernel and a '6.3' kernel.  The goal here was 
to make it simple to downgrade from the 6.4 kernel to the 6.3 kernel if you 
find issues with the newer kernel.

The basic idea was, if you want to downgrade kernels you shouldn't have to do 
any extra magic to get OpenAFS to work.  This comes at the expense of an extra 
kernel, but the alternatives would require far more end user work for 
something that 'just worked' on 6.3 and earlier.

I hope this is helpful,
Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2