On 03/13/2013 02:21 PM, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> There are a small number of packages that seem like they might be inadvertently missing from the security updates for the x86_64 build of 6.3.
>
>     1) openchange-1.0-4.el6.i686.rpm
>     2) openchange-devel-1.0-4.el6.i686.rpm
>     3) samba4-libs-4.0.0-55.el6.rc4.i686.rpm
>     4) pytalloc-2.0.7-2.el6.i686.rpm
>     5) ldb-tools-1.1.13-3.el6.x86_64.rpm
>
> These packages are available in other SL repositories like 6rolling or the i386 build, but it would be nice if they were added to the x86_64 6.3 updates.
>
> If there's a reason that these particular updates aren't well-suited for use in 6.3 or if I'm missing something obvious, I'd be very curious to know.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,

Thanks for looking so closely at these.  The massive volume of RPMS produced 
when a minor release is made can make for all sorts of accidents.  A 
repoclosure came back clean, but that doesn't always mean everything is as it 
should be.

I'll do my best to tackle these in order:

RPMS 1&2 are part of RHSA-2013:0515-02 which only lists those rpms as in the 
i686 tree.  They were not put in the x86_64 tree based on that documentation.  
If their documentation is wrong, we need to let them know and I'll fix up the 
SL tree.

RPM 3 is part of RHSA-2013:0506-2 it is only listed as in the i686 tree as 
well. They were not put in the x86_64 tree based on that documentation.  If 
their documentation is wrong, we need to let them know and I'll fix up the SL 
tree.

RPM 4 is part of RHBA-2013:0352-1 and is only listed in the i686 tree. They 
were not put in the x86_64 tree based on that documentation.  If their 
documentation is wrong, we need to let them know and I'll fix up the SL tree.

RPM 5 is part of RHBA-2013:0372-1 and shows I've made an error here!

I'll get ldb-tools-1.1.13-3.el6.x86_64.rpm staged and pushed out (probably 
tomorrow as I'm hopeful to get a few other items pushed too).  I missed the 
i686 version in the i386 tree too.


Good catch!!!

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/