SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:07:55 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 02/19/2013 05:26 PM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:

>
>> Why, exactly, do you need gcc-4.1?
> We have a simulator which is old. I can fix the compiler errors under gcc 4.4 for the code *itself*. However the code uses boost 1.33.1 and this version of boost won't compile on gcc4.4.
>
> Since I am not familiar with the complex structure of boost, at this time I have to find a way to *just* run the code.

Scientific Linux 5 seems to be a good match for someone that wants boost 
1.33.1 and gcc 4.1

Matthias

>
>
> Regards,
> Mahmood
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2