SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:00:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
On 02/08/2013 08:56 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Paul Robert Marino<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>> I should be making some samba4 rpms soon but mine will not start with
>> fedora. RedHat has this insane idea that they are going to fix MIT kerberos
>> 5 after more than a decade of it being broken. So they've stripped out the
>> embedded heimdal kdc. The problem is it doesn't work properly without
>> heimdal. And the latest version of heimdal is compatible with the kdc in
>> windows server 2012.
>> Ps don't worry I'm not going to replace the mit libraries or client that
>> would be crazy instead I'm going to install them heimdal versions in
>> different locations.
> ??? Oh, boy. I interviewed there for a QA role on the IPA project.
> (Good role, I think I just didn't have the deep Kerberos chops they
> were looking for.)
>
> I've grabbed the Fedora 18 SRPM and am trying to backport it. It has
> these missing dependencies in SL 6:
>
>          iniparser
>          libldb # breaks dependences for sssd on old libldb version
>          libtalloc
>          libtdb
>          libtevent
>          systemd # the new init script scheme in recent Fedora releases
>
> For a number of those dependencies, Samba 4.0.2 won't even compile on
> SL 6 without updates.

I looked at systemd a ways back, getting that on SL6 is basically 
impossible.  By the time you've chased its dependencies there aren't a 
whole lot of core libraries that you've left alone.

Pat

>
>>
>>
>> -- Sent from my HP Pre3
>>
>> ________________________________
>> On Feb 8, 2013 1:39 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>
>> Not a problem. The "samba4" package in SL 6, and the upstream vendor's
>> package, is *nasty*. It should have been called something like
>> "openchange-samba4" because it's a stripped Samba 4 release, designed
>> to be used as a plugin for OpenChange softwae and under no
>> circumstances to operate as a an actual Samba server.
>>
>> I've taken a potshot at backporting the Fedora 18 release of Samba to
>> SL 6, and it's.... an adventure in dependencies. Just to start with,
>> the "tdb" release has to be at least version 1.2.10 for Samba 4, and
>> as soon as you starting basic system libraries, you're in potential
>> dependency hell.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Andrew Z<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>> Mark, Nico,
>>> i went ahead with the 3rd version. Thank you!
>>> AZ
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia<[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Mark Stodola<[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 02/07/2013 04:17 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i need to set up samba. and apparently there was a new release 4
>>>>>> already.
>>>>>> so i did yum search, but:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> samba4-4.0.0-23.alpha11.el6.x86_64
>>>>>> [root@server ~]# rpm -ql samba4
>>>>>> /usr/share/doc/samba4-4.0.0
>>>>>> /usr/share/doc/samba4-4.0.0/COPYING
>>>>>> /usr/share/doc/samba4-4.0.0/WHATSNEW4.txt


-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2