SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:38:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Not a problem. The "samba4" package in SL 6, and the upstream vendor's
package, is *nasty*. It should have been called something like
"openchange-samba4" because it's a stripped Samba 4 release, designed
to be used as a plugin for OpenChange softwae and under no
circumstances to operate as a an actual Samba server.

I've taken a potshot at backporting the Fedora 18 release of Samba to
SL 6, and it's.... an adventure in dependencies. Just to start with,
the "tdb" release has to be at least version 1.2.10 for Samba 4, and
as soon as you starting basic system libraries, you're in potential
dependency hell.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Andrew Z <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Mark, Nico,
>  i went ahead with the 3rd version. Thank you!
> AZ
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Mark Stodola <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> > On 02/07/2013 04:17 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> i need to set up samba. and apparently there was a new release 4
>> >> already.
>> >> so i did yum search, but:
>> >>
>> >> samba4-4.0.0-23.alpha11.el6.x86_64
>> >> [root@server ~]# rpm -ql samba4
>> >> /usr/share/doc/samba4-4.0.0
>> >> /usr/share/doc/samba4-4.0.0/COPYING
>> >> /usr/share/doc/samba4-4.0.0/WHATSNEW4.txt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2