SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:14:56 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:46:11AM -0600, Connie Sieh wrote:
> 
> If a i386/x86_64 laptop is certified for the "Windows 8 logo" then
> it has to have "secure boot" enabled in the bios(uefi) by default as
> required by Microsoft.  Secure boot requires a 'signed by microsoft'
> program to boot. But the bios(uefi) is REQUIRED to have a method to
> turn off the "secure boot" option and thus not require a microsoft
> signed os.
>

Is all this still theoretical? I have not seen any recent laptops,
but on recent desktop mobos (from ASUS), indeed, in the BIOS setup,
I see the button to enable "secure boot". This button is "off" by default,
Linux boots just fine.

So is there an issue bigger than having to go into the BIOS setup
to turn off "secure boot"?

In other news, when people ask me "which Linux laptop to buy?", I tell
them to buy a Mac. For all practical purposes MacOS acts as a funny Linux,
the main difference being that all the hardware and software actually
does works as advertised. (That does cost you a few extra $$$, of course).

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2