SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Stodola <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Stodola <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:17:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
On 10/23/2012 12:02 AM, Olivier Mauras wrote:
> On 2012-10-23 06:09, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Olivier Mauras wrote:
>>> Hello, I'm trying to set in place a centralized patch management for
>>> my SL installations with pulp. After synchronizing a few
>>> repositories, i noted that pulp wasn't seeing any erratas in the
>>> repos. The actual issue is that SL repos don't provide any
>>> updateinfo.xml file. Any reason for that? Is that a desired state?
>>> Could it be possible to work this out - maybe recreating them from
>>> another source or such ?
>> The SL6rolling security updates directory now includes an
>> updateinfo.xml file. I only noticed this recently, so guess that
>> it is a new feature.
>
> Ah true... Any chance to see them in fixed version repos?
>

There was a posting on the SL-devel mailing list earlier this month 
regarding the updateinfo.xml and yum-security support being in "Alpha1". 
  It is still in testing and is not rolled out to any other 
repositories.  See the archives for more detailed info:

http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1210&L=scientific-linux-devel&T=0&P=309

-Mark

-- 
Mr. Mark V. Stodola
Senior Control Systems Engineer

National Electrostatics Corp.
P.O. Box 620310
Middleton, WI 53562-0310 USA
Phone: (608) 831-7600
Fax: (608) 831-9591

ATOM RSS1 RSS2