SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:38:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
On 10/28/2012 09:13 PM, Chris Schanzle wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 03:29 AM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>> On 10/27/2012 07:42 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
>>>       You can put an fsck command in /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
>>>
>>> Steven Yellin
>>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> SL 6.2, x64
>>>>
>>>> I have an "ext 4" drive (/dev/sdb1)  I use for backup that is
>>>> deliberately not in my fstab.
>>>>
>>>> "touch /forcefsck" will only force a check on my main ("/")
>>>> drive.
>>>>
>>>> Question: is there a way to trigger an an fsck at boot on
>>>> this backup drive?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> -T
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thank you.  Thank will work.
>>
>> Actually, I am trying to solve the mystery of how to get it to
>> fsck at the same time as "touch /forcefsck".  Do you know
>> how to do this?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> -T
>
> Hi Todd,
>
> Have you perused through tune2fs(8) to notice you may set a
> max-mount-counts to 1 or maybe a daily interval-between-checks to 1d?
>
> Why are you so adverse to an fstab entry?  If you specify option
> "noauto" it won't be mounted on boot, but it *might* fsck with the others.


Hi Chris,

Only certain scripts need access or even need to know this drive exists.
I deliberately do not have it in my fstab.  I use this drive as you 
would a removable flash drive.

What I am up to is trying to see if there is any clue as to why
I drop to maintenance mode every so often with a message that
fsck can not lock the drive because it is in use.  Our intrepid
heroes at Red Hat are troubleshooting this for me:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836696

"cat /proc/mounts" in maintenance mode does not even show the drive as
mounted (it is not suppose to be).  And "lsof" shows nothing accessing
the drive (it is not mounted).

I am just digging around looking for any clue that might help them.
I just used your suggestion on "tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/lin-bak"
and posted it to the bug.

Thank you for the help,
-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2