SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

October 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Some 6.3 SRPM have "gpg NOT OK"
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:51:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines) 
Sorry about that, should be fixed now

Pat

On 10/24/2012 08:46 AM, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some source packages in "6.3/SRPMS/sl6-added/" are broken.
> "rpm -K" shows "gpg NOT OK" .
>
> At least:
>> glib-1.2.10-33.el6.src.rpm
>> gtk+-1.2.10-70.el6.src.rpm
>> imlib-1.9.15-14.el6.src.rpm
> Maybe more.
>
> The binary ones are OK.
>
> Perhaps the same issues as was some time ago (hope not an intrusion :) )
>
> (Note, that packages with the same exact version are present in the 
> Fedora EPEL6 repo).
>
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry Butskoy
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy


-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2