SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SSD and RAID question
From:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:46:34 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
On 09/17/2012 07:27 PM, Jeff Siddall wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 03:03 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> It looks like in the example that all four drives are in their
>> own RAID1 arrays, but are missing their companion drives.
>> A misconfiguration perhaps?
>>
>> -T
>
> Nope.  There are 4 RAID 1 arrays on 4 separate partitions on the same
> drive.  When the drive disappears all 4 arrays are degraded.
>
> Jeff
>

Yes, I did miss the sda on all four partitions.  Does the
[2/1] mean this is the first of two drives?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2