Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:29:09 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 16:20 -0700, Henrique Junior wrote:
> Hello, Volker
> I'm already a Fedora packager (not an experient one) and I'd love to
> put ntop in EPEL (it is in EPEL for EL5). The problem in maintain ntop
> in EPEL6 is that Fedora now uses systemd to manage our services
> instead of sysv. It is a Fedora policy to keep only one spec file and
> that spec is not compatible with EL6 anymore.
This is certainly no policy and would be impossible in many cases.
Volker
> That is why I believe that RPMForge is the better option.
> I'm open to ideas to make this package as useful as possible.
>
>
>
> --
> Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
> http://about.me/henriquejunior
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> From: Volker Fröhlich <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Henrique Junior <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: Scientific Linux Users <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: ntop for EL6
>
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 11:56 -0700, Henrique Junior wrote:
> > Hi, list
> > I've created some ntop (5.0-2) RPMs for EL6[1] and I have
> plans to
> > submit it to RPMForge, but, before I do so, I'd like to test
> it.
>
> Dear Henrique?
>
> Have you considered to contribute to EPEL and/or Fedora
> directly? That'd
> be the best approach, because most people could profit from
> your work.
> You could maintain the EL branches for ntop, if Sven Lankes
> doesn't like
> to.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
>
> Volker Fröhlich
>
> > I'd love if the network administration guys here could give
> it a try
> > and send me some feedback.
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > [1] - http://upload.lonelyspooky.com/rpm/EL6/
> >
> > --
> > Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
> > http://about.me/henriquejunior
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|