SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:33:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi All,

On several Windows machines lately, I have been using
Intel's Cherryville enterprise SSD drives.  They work
very, very well.

Cherryville drives have a 1.2 million hour MTBF (mean time
between failure) and a 5 year warranty.

I have been thinking, for small business servers
with a low data requirement, what would be the
risk of dropping RAID in favor of just one of these
drives?

Seems to me the RAID controller would have a worse
MTBF than a Cherryville SSD drive?

And, does SL 6 have trim stuff built into it?

What do you all think?

Many thanks,
-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2