On 11 July 2012 02:10, Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
>>> unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
>>> work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
>>> to allocate disk space?
>>
>> What is it with people thinking that CentOS is some kind of competition for
>> SL or RHEL?
>>
>> Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
>>
>> SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they have
>> with each other point release.
>
> Indeed. I hate to repeatedly quote my old post, but as far as there
> are people who say "beat", I feel like doing it :)
>
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1201&L=scientific-linux-users&T=0&P=17067
>
> Akemi

Furthermore, the release of CentOS 6.3 was not "unannounced".

For the record, here is the official announcement --

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-July/018706.html

Alan.