SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 1 Jul 2012 21:13:21 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In #slforum today lewellyn mentioned that yum-builddep doesn't seem to 
work on SL the same way it does on CentOS and upstream.

A command like:
yum-builddep [package]

fails like this:

> [root@tortilla opt]# yum-builddep openssh
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> Enabling epel-source repository
> Enabling tao-dev-source repository
> No source RPM found for openssh-5.3p1-70.el6.x86_64
> No uninstalled build requires

> [root@tortilla opt]# yum-builddep samba
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> Enabling epel-source repository
> Enabling tao-dev-source repository
> No source RPM found for samba-3.5.10-114.el6.x86_64
> No source RPM found for samba-3.5.10-116.el6_2.x86_64
> No source RPM found for samba-3.5.10-115.el6_2.x86_64
> No uninstalled build requires

It seems like yum-builddep isn't used by a huge number of folks these 
days (myself included), but it is useful for people who do local builds 
outside of mock. The problem appears to be that the repodata indicates a 
flat directory structure, but within SRPMS/ there is a nested structure 
which clearly segregates the packages by origin.

Any ideas?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2