SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:49:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
How does Scientific Linux differ from Scientific Linux CERN?

Asking because it looks like SL CERN has released their 6.3 spin:
http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/news.shtml#SLC63

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Anne Wilson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 21/07/12 05:42, Peter Boy wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2012, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Larry Linder:
>>> Different point of view: As a long time SL user - I am quite
>>> happy to wait until the dust settles and we have a stable
>>> release.
>>
>> +++
>>
> These two responses surprise me, so perhaps I didn't make my point
> clear.  I trust the SL team to backport or otherwise give me essential
> security updates.  I consider anything else as a bonus, not a
> necessity.  I, too, came to SL for stability above latest-and-greatest.
>
> Anne
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlAKeooACgkQj93fyh4cnBcWBwCfcUdWsHdHGBmbePmVKxTSuukY
> nZcAn23gsXhrdiYeMAoEFedwwUBl9YaD
> =Rjnm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2