SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL to 6.3 release
From:
Anne Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Anne Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:46:52 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/07/12 05:42, Peter Boy wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 19.07.2012, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Larry Linder:
>> Different point of view: As a long time SL user - I am quite 
>> happy to wait until the dust settles and we have a stable 
>> release.
> 
> +++
> 
These two responses surprise me, so perhaps I didn't make my point
clear.  I trust the SL team to backport or otherwise give me essential
security updates.  I consider anything else as a bonus, not a
necessity.  I, too, came to SL for stability above latest-and-greatest.

Anne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAKeooACgkQj93fyh4cnBcWBwCfcUdWsHdHGBmbePmVKxTSuukY
nZcAn23gsXhrdiYeMAoEFedwwUBl9YaD
=Rjnm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2