Hey!

On 07/18/2012 02:00 PM, zxq9 wrote:
> I'm sure Connie or Pat would be the people to ask about the QA process
> and probably happy to discuss is -- the site/wiki isn't always the focus
> at SL, it seems (forums aside, I think a lot of us here read/edit your
> wiki over at CentOS for non-dev stuff, come to think of it).

Excellent :) More editing please...

> Anyway, nice to see you around, KB. Didn't know you kept up with the ML
> here. Hope you're still having fun.
> 

To be honest, while I am on the list - the b/w to keep up is mostly
non-existant. I was pointed to this thread with a 'So, you guys do no
testing' comment. I'm a bit sensitive about the QA team  - these guys do
a lot of work under a fair bit of pressure from a LOT of people, to have
their work slighted in that manner was a bit off putting.

On the other hand, testing is one of those things that one can never do
enough of. And specially when our target is only made available once
someone else has made up their mind as to what it needs to look like :
things get trickier. fun, for sure.

- KB
-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219    | Yahoo IM: z00dax      | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc