SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

July 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Farkas Levente <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Farkas Levente <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:22:35 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On 07/12/2012 07:47 PM, zxq9 wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 08:03 PM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, David Crick wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like Mark may have hit the nail on the head
>>> by identifying the ati-driver. I will try on my second
>>> machine here and confirm whether it works for me
>>> as well.
>>
>> 'Fraid not. My three machines all have intel graphics chips
>> and SL62. Two with identical motherboards: one upgraded smoothly the
>> other
>> didn't. The third is a laptop and the upgrade broke it.
>>
> 
> Just helped a guy out in the slforum IRC yesterday with this same
> problem on SL 6.1 (nVidia graphics on his system -- the graphics drivers
> aren't the issue). The resolution was a downgrade.
> 
> The specific problem in the xorg log was that the evdev input module
> couldn't load because of a version mismatch. There may be other
> mismatches, but that was the point xorg gave up.
> 
> Whenever the graphics drivers load first GDM will display but no input
> is possible, if the graphics is scheduled after evdev then x won't give
> you a graphical indication that anything is moving.

xorg driver should have to rebuild with the right xorg packages in the
buildsys repo (it was one of our problems too).

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2