SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:58:43 +0100
Reply-To:
James Holland <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: Looks like CentOS beat SL to 6.3 release
From:
James Holland <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On 18/07/12 13:36, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
>
> erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
>
>> SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
>> have with each other point release.
>
> Would love to see this testing process/code documented somewhere and
> what the implications are. So we might be able to better and improve the
> process in CentOS as well.

Is there a place where you document the CentOS processes?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2