SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:38:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Hi all,

I need some help and advice with LTO tape drives.  I haven't kept up with tape technology for several years now and from a quick google, it appears that the only games in town are LTO and DDS.  We do have a single DDS deployment and we are looking at replacing it with LTO because of capacity limitations.

Some questions:

(1) It appears that LTO-5 is the current technology. But most single drives use SAS as an interface.  Again, I am not familiar with SAS.  All I know is what the acronym stands for.  Is it a simple matter of buying a SAS card?  Will it run out of the box on a SL6.x box?  Any issues with drivers?

(2) I see that LTO-4 is still available.  And a quick google suggests that Ultra160 or 320 LVD SCSI is the more common interface for these drives.  I have several of the Adaptec 29xxx cards, made available when we transitioned to SATA.  Is this viable or would you recommend against using LTO-4?  It appears to be about 5 years old.  I think it would be preferable to use technology that has at least some life to it but I am not inclined to work very hard to make LTO-5 work if it is not well supported on Linux.

We are not looking to do anything fancy.  A single internal drive and a box of tapes.  Backups the old fashioned way.

Specific recommendations welcomed.  As in, buy this card, buy this drive!

Thanks!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2